So the harmer says: "Many food stores and food retailers have announced implementation of third-party verification measures to ensure the animals from which food products are derived were treated humanely. In the near future, customers will demand third-party verification and if it doesn’t exist, the store providing the food is not going to be credible with the public.Agriculture can win this battle for the hearts and minds of consumers. Farmers and ranchers must remember whom they are trying to influence. Customers and consumers need to hear from livestock producers.It is not productive for the agriculture community to attack activist groups. Instead, agriculture must retake its rightful position as the people in charge of ensuring the humane treatment of animals.Agriculture must inform people we share their concerns and we work hard every day to make sure our animals are treated fairly and humanely. Follow that by sharing with them how we meet our obligations to the humane treatment of the animals on our farms."Now what exactly is "humane" - Everyone wants to know! It seems that consumers are having a hard time with figuring out the "standards" that others are suggesting:
Animal Welfare Institute
Animal Welfare Approved
USDA Livestock Behavior Research
Animal Wellbeing Program
Animal Care and Use Committee
Animal Welfare Quality
Compassion in World Farming
Animal Wellbeing Program
Animal Care and Use Committee
Animal Welfare Quality
Compassion in World Farming
This list of "experts" and diverse "welfare ratings" could go on and on... But there are a few basic "rules" to what they all say is "humane". And they are: that all animal intended as "food", ought to have food and water themselves... (duh) And animals ought to be given appropriate medical treatment just to insure they don't (accidentally) die... And that when it is time for them to be killed it should be done "humanely". From there on there is a plethora of variables that can get very confusing.
So, if you're someone looking to figure out what is "humane" and you can't quite sort all the details out yourself - Perhaps you should play The Humane Game:
It sort of works like chutes and ladders... You know - You find a "free range" egg... But ooops! You just learned the hen came from a hatchery where millions of male chicks are killed --- Down the slide you go!
Hey! Found some "grass fed beef"? But wait a second... You discover the dehorning and castration process is done without anesthetics --- Gosh, down the slide you go again!
What about "organic milk" from happy cows? Oh no!!! They take away their babies too! And the poor cows are shuffled off to the industrial slaughterhouses along side their "factory" sisters. Yep... This game is going to be pretty hard alright.
Now... How about some bacon sourced from pigs that are wallowing contentedly in the mud and sunshine... Uh, Oh... You pull the card that has this question: Is it really right to remove a "happy" animal from the earth either?
Let's face it... It's a game that can't be won! There is no "humane" way to eat animals!
Finally, if you really want to get technical about it --- Here goes:
"Humane" means to be concerned with alleviating suffering. These animals are not diseased, crippled or in aged pain. They are delivered young and healthy and "fit for life", so there is absolutely no "misery" to relieve these animals of- Only terror and pain to cause.
The saddest thing of all though in this Humane Game is that
it's always the animals that lose!
Tired of playing games with innocent lives? Learn more: Humane Myth

