While I piece together an upcoming post on direct action as a method to raise awareness about animal issues - I thought I'd interject this post about a few animal rights activists in Iowa who "taped" a "Go Vegan" sign on a butter sculpture cow.
Now... I'm not about to go into all the reasons these cow sculptures are a gigantic farce because I've already done that before and before that. But what I will do is admit to a lot of skepticism about the alleged butter caper. The story just doesn't make much sense! Wouldn't a group that was able to scale a wall and sneak past guards have more "destruction" in mind than a sign taped to a coagulated fatty substance?
Or would it be more reasonable to think that these Iowa animal ag folks had a sneaky idea to promote their absurd butter-cow/dairy/egg and pork politics?
Truth is... Doesn't matter much what you eat at the Iowa Fair - As long as it's got an animal part or secretion in it...
Yep... There's "activism" and "politics" all around butter. So says the winner of the "dairy princess crown". She likes to go to day care kids and teach them all about cheese and "milking units".
But before, during and after all this politicking and partying with meat, eggs and dairy there's stories that bring truths back in focus... Like what I see in this cow's milk propaganda photo:
Sure the kids are curious... Who wouldn't love a new born calf? Especially the mother who bore him?
But here's a boy with new leather shoes... Meanwhile a girl's pink leather sneaker is being stepped on by the poor, confused, mother-less baby calf... Contrast this with the reality that humans actually cut the feet off of baby calves... Sometimes when their still alive! Andbash their skulls to make them not be so... And you've got a culture totally at odds with who they want to be and who they really are!
All of it is sickening and shameful!
Don't like the dishonesty in Iowa, in dairy or in your own life? Then quit with the unnecessary and unkind animal killing and animal eating! Go Vegan - And live in a Gentle World
The debates between what is best for nonhumans on their road to liberation has circulated through the Animal Rights movement since forever... In my few years I surely have seen both sides of the arguments and have been torn many times about the consequential infighting that occurs as a result. I lament because they are counterproductive and the animals only stand to loose when any of us takes our eye off the goal.
From the 1989 Agricultural Law newsletter What is effective strategy? Some find it useful to objectify naked humans to get their point across... Some appeal with vegan food... Some initiate petitions... Some plead through the legal system... Some do open rescue and undercover video... Some destroy property... And on and on.
Which is the answer? My belief is that all of it is necessary to change society. I don't think there is one single road to convince billions that animals deserve their lives. Different messages reach different people. Some come to Animal Rights through viewing a graphic image... Some make their connection via a sanctuary. Point is... There is no "one way".
I don't support welfare. My end goal is to see nonhumans out of man's domination entirely... But I do know that every tactical battle includes incremental change and multi-faceted strategies. I know that nothing will change over night and that reform efforts will continue till the goal is reached. That's just fact.
I know too that when someone buys "cage free" or "free-range" options because they care... It is up to abolitionists to correct the positions to what "care" really means...
A HOLISTIC APPROACH:
I think Animal Rights will be had through a constant series of measures that ever-more pushes in the same direction. But whatever each of us chooses to invest our advocacy time, effort and money in is something that I stand little hope of influencing, so I avoid criticizing fellow advocates. My focus has always been on addressing consumers who are unaware or disengaged from the systems that exploits nonhumans: Carnists.
I view culture's relationship to nonhumans as an injury... Really more like a sickness, requiring many therapeutic steps towards recovery. Would I recommend the "medicine" of continued animal use in "better ways" as part of the cure? Absolutely not... But I'm afraid there are "doctors" that would suggest this. Our job as healers is to tear down this idea every chance we get. And to remind everyone that the end goal is not to use animals at all... No matter how much sugar is on the poison.
Put another way of how I see Animal Rights as a multi-tactical, "holistic" endeavor is by viewing it through a prism:
Direct Actionas in acts of open rescue and under cover video will increase awareness of issues.
Science & Health will expand options for better choices. Concerns to the environment and diseases caused by raising and eating flesh will persist... So will technologies create "vat meats" and urban farms. This will all reduce animal consumption.
Economic & Legislative changes will influence demand. If politicians are sent the message that favors, grants and tax payer funding to these institutions is unacceptable... Eventually the animal using industries will be forced to operate in a true market.
Social & Cultural contributions are seen everywhere through literature, Animal Rights artists, plays, music and other methods of emotional/aesthetic expression.
Generational Influence will accumulate and re-adapt it's relationship to nonhumans. Because the nature of youth is to constantly question the teachings of the generation before - They will be more receptive to new ideas and progressive thinking.
Advocacy will press on throughout all these other changes. And it will be a mix of welfare, reform and abolition... I know what shade of "purple" I think is the best - But I also realize that others will see it their own way, with or without my approval. And the time/energy spent arguing with each other - means that's less attention reaching totally unaware & disengaged individuals.
Obviously, I am confessing that I haven't got any one "right" answer as to the way justice will be achieved. I'm not enough of an expert and have no crystal ball to say what the "only" way to abolition is. Thus far I believe that all changes are part of the grand scheme.
I know the quickest way is for everyone to just "go vegan" - It's a pure idea. But most see that as extreme and will muddle their way only with constant nudging. Using reforms helps those people drag their way down the road. I don't like it. But it's what we have until a tipping point can be reached.
I'm not against anyone's personal tactics to achieve Animal Rights. All that I ask is that they sincerely question whether their work really does help animals... Or does it just help people continue to use them?
The following have helped shape my views:
Yes, we do support a gradual, incremental approach to animal liberation, but one vegan meal at a time – not one inch of cage space at a time. The distant goal must be a vegan world – not a world with animals in huge cages. ~Alex Hershaft FARM President and Founder
I don't believe there is one single strategy which will work, exclusive of others. Spreading the message through potlucks or protests all have their place within this movement.
And in Texas the ones that don't get killed by the heat are being sent to slaughter all the sooner because there just isn't enough water or grass.
No big worries for these ranchers and harmers though... They get reimbursed through the Livestock Indemnity Program and all is well.
But... Just in case you are prone to eating any of these creatures - I suggest that you re-consider what "humane meat" is... Are you factoring in for the whole system that you contribute to? Are you taking into account the torturous deaths to these animals in floods and fires? Or are you just considering their happy deaths at the slaughterhouses?
A terrible incident has occurred in which almost 80 people have been infected and one person dead from an outbreak of anti-bacterial resistant Salmonella connected with "turkey" products.
Despite a recall back in April of 55,000 pounds of Jennie-O turkey meat, the USDA and CDC had yet to name the source of the current outbreak. And really, it's no wonder about the confusion - The recall was for products packaged on Nov. 23, 2010... Just days before the sacrificed one's were due for worship on holy "Turkey Day".
The recall has since been expanded to 36 million pounds (16300 metric tons).
And this new facility includes: solar power to heat its water; capture heat from the refrigeration system that can be used as heating source; and employ high-efficiency processing equipment as its pursues LEED Platinum certification. Check it out!
